During July and August 2009, a case scenario involving first-line therapy for a “fit” patient with a new diagnosis of MM was presented to AHOMD consultants. Relevant history and physical, lab, imaging, and hematopathology data were provided. After receiving the consultant’s therapy of choice, the status of the patient’s disease was assessed, and level of response (complete response [CR], very good partial response [VGPR], partial response [PR]) to induction therapy was varied in sequential research queries to assess the impact of response status to initial therapy on plans for immediate ASCT.
A summary of the recommendations by the magnitude of response after 4 cycles of induction therapy are shown below:

These data demonstrate that in a “fit” patient with a new diagnosis of MM who was considered a transplant candidate prior to starting therapy, follow-through with transplant depends on the magnitude of the induction response achieved.
A “magnitude of response-adapted paradigm” for total induction therapy, including or excluding ASCT consolidation, is operative in patients with a new diagnosis of MM.
1. Joanne Willey, RN, Kristine E. Lemke, MBA, Michael E. Williams, MD, Mark R Green, MD, Sagar Lonial, MD. Does the magnitude of response to initial induction therapy impact plans for immediate autologous stem cell transplant consolidation in the transplant-eligible patient with a new diagnosis of multiple myeloma? 2010 ASCO Annual Meeting. Abst # 8146.
Xcenda can help. Take a closer look: